[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100425023633.GN2440@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:36:33 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nauman@...gle.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious
rcu_dereference_check() usage
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 01:35:01AM -0400, Miles Lane wrote:
> 2.6.34-rc5-git5 with all of your patches applied.
>
> I reconfigured my kernel build options and got the following new issue:
>
> [ 2.686515] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> [ 2.686519] ---------------------------------------------------
> [ 2.686523] kernel/cgroup.c:4438 invoked rcu_dereference_check()
> without protection!
> [ 2.686526]
> [ 2.686527] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 2.686529]
> [ 2.686532]
> [ 2.686533] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> [ 2.686537] 2 locks held by swapper/1:
> [ 2.686540] #0: (mtd_table_mutex){+.+.+.}, at:
> [<ffffffff812d7714>] register_mtd_blktrans+0xa2/0x25e
> [ 2.686555] #1: (&(&blkcg->lock)->rlock){......}, at:
> [<ffffffff811ca7bd>] blkiocg_add_blkio_group+0x29/0x7f
> [ 2.686566]
> [ 2.686567] stack backtrace:
> [ 2.686572] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5-git5 #25
> [ 2.686576] Call Trace:
> [ 2.686584] [<ffffffff810642da>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9d/0xa5
> [ 2.686591] [<ffffffff8107af54>] css_id+0x3f/0x52
> [ 2.686597] [<ffffffff811ca7cc>] blkiocg_add_blkio_group+0x38/0x7f
> [ 2.686603] [<ffffffff811cc593>] cfq_init_queue+0xdf/0x2dc
> [ 2.686609] [<ffffffff811bb858>] elevator_init+0xba/0xf5
> [ 2.686616] [<ffffffff812d7046>] ? mtd_blktrans_request+0x0/0x1c
> [ 2.686623] [<ffffffff811c0b62>] blk_init_queue_node+0x12f/0x135
> [ 2.686629] [<ffffffff811c0b74>] blk_init_queue+0xc/0xe
> [ 2.686635] [<ffffffff812d7777>] register_mtd_blktrans+0x105/0x25e
> [ 2.686642] [<ffffffff818c0de9>] ? init_mtdblock+0x0/0x2c
> [ 2.686648] [<ffffffff818c0e13>] init_mtdblock+0x2a/0x2c
> [ 2.686656] [<ffffffff810001ef>] do_one_initcall+0x59/0x14e
> [ 2.686663] [<ffffffff818986a6>] kernel_init+0x160/0x1ea
> [ 2.686669] [<ffffffff81003814>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [ 2.686677] [<ffffffff8140d77c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [ 2.686683] [<ffffffff81898546>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1ea
> [ 2.686688] [<ffffffff81003810>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> [ 2.687683] mtdoops: mtd device (mtddev=name/number) must be supplied
This should be covered by the patch I sent with my previous email.
And thank you again, Miles, for all the testing!!!
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists