[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BD599A7.6090202@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:48:23 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, jeremy@...p.org,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, ngupta@...are.org, JBeulich@...ell.com,
chris.mason@...cle.com, kurt.hackel@...cle.com,
dave.mccracken@...cle.com, npiggin@...e.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview
On 04/26/2010 03:45 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>> dma engines are present on commodity hardware now:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I/O_Acceleration_Technology
>>
>> I don't know if consumer machines have them, but servers certainly do.
>> modprobe ioatdma.
>>
> They don't seem to have gained much ground in the FIVE YEARS
> since the patch was first posted to Linux, have they?
>
Why do you say this? Servers have them and AFAIK networking uses them.
There are other uses of the API in the code, but I don't know how much
of this is for bulk copies.
> Maybe it's because memory-to-memory copy using a CPU
> is so fast (especially for page-ish quantities of data)
> and is a small percentage of CPU utilization these days?
>
Copies take a small percentage of cpu because a lot of care goes into
avoiding them, or placing them near the place where the copy is used.
They certainly show up in high speed networking.
A page-sized copy is small, but many of them will be expensive.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists