[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100426190806.GA8565@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:08:06 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 2/4] perf probe: Fix to use symtab only if no
debuginfo
Em Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 02:59:36PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 03:56:24PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> >> Fix perf probe to use symtab only if there is no debuginfo,
> >> because debuginfo has more precise information than symtab.
> >
> > "more precise"? Wouldn't it be "more expressive", i.e. with more
> > information (parameter list with types, return type, location of
> > parameters, etc), because what is common to both have the same value,
> > i.e. the function address and size.
>
> Indeed. debuginfo has just more information than symtab, but
> symtab certainly provides precise information for symbol-address.
I applied the patch, just replaced "more precise information" with "more
information".
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists