linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100426214156.GA32326@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:41:56 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:59:49AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
 > There have been various reports of the ondemand governor causing some
 > serious performance issues, one of the latest ones from Andrew.
 > There are several fundamental issues with ondemand (being worked on),
 > but the report from Andrew can be fixed relatively easily.
 > 
 > The fundamental issue is that ondemand will go to a (too) low CPU
 > frequency for workloads that alternatingly disk and CPU bound...

given the scheduler changes, these probably make more sense to go
via one of Ingo's trees ?
If everyone agrees, feel free to add my Signed-off-by:

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/