linux-kernel - Re: parport_pc.c and parport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100426231045.115d9cd4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:10:45 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Joseph Krahn <joseph.krahn@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: parport_pc.c and parport_serial.c need improvements

> parport_pc, similar to parport_serial. In any case, it would be nice
> to see more comments on why the SuperIO code is designed as it is.

I think the superIO code is more 'evolved' than 'designed'. It's
something people nailed bits onto in passing rather than structured
elegantly.

Do what you think is right IMHO.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/