[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100426094810.GE27497@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:48:11 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Catch filesystems lacking s_bdi
On Fri, Apr 23 2010, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Fri, 23 April 2010 12:05:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > So it's probably safe and good enough as-is, I'll add it. Thanks!
>
> I cannot see this patch in your tree yet. Could be the weekend or a
> deliberate decision not to send this for 2.6.34-rc anymore.
It's there, I put it in yesterday. It's definitely 2.6.34-rc material, I
hope to submit it tonight.
> In case it was a deliberate decision, can we please make it explicit? I
> don't like the idea of adding a BUG_ON() that potentially triggers for
> thousands of people this late in the stabilization process - but it is
> better than having people lose data. Even if we already ran two stable
> kernels that way.
>
> Damned if you do, damned if you don't. :(
Yeah, it's a bad situation to be in. I changed that BUG_ON() to a
WARN_ON(). I'm not too worried about that part, I'm more worried about
the file system changed. OTOH, they do lack proper flushing now, so it's
likely not a huge risk from that perspective.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists