[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f038ee35-8b34-4305-b93a-49383c86f83e@default>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, jeremy@...p.org,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, ngupta@...are.org, JBeulich@...ell.com,
chris.mason@...cle.com, kurt.hackel@...cle.com,
dave.mccracken@...cle.com, npiggin@...e.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com
Subject: RE: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview
> dma engines are present on commodity hardware now:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I/O_Acceleration_Technology
>
> I don't know if consumer machines have them, but servers certainly do.
> modprobe ioatdma.
They don't seem to have gained much ground in the FIVE YEARS
since the patch was first posted to Linux, have they?
Maybe it's because memory-to-memory copy using a CPU
is so fast (especially for page-ish quantities of data)
and is a small percentage of CPU utilization these days?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists