[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100427102611.GB2670@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:26:11 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Egger <siccegge@...fau.de>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vamos@...informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doublecheck for CONFIG_64
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> THis is a check for CONFIG_64 inside a block that is only active when
> CONFIG_64 is set. So the check is actually useless and potentially
> irritation.
>
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/vdso.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/vdso.c
> @@ -102,11 +102,7 @@ static void vdso_init_per_cpu_data(int cpu, struct vdso_per_cpu_data *vpcd)
> /*
> * Allocate/free per cpu vdso data.
> */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> #define SEGMENT_ORDER 2
> -#else
> -#define SEGMENT_ORDER 1
> -#endif
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists