[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201004271339.34711.trenn@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:39:34 +0200
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
davej@...hat.com, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ondemand: Solve the big performance issue with ondemand during disk IO
On Friday 23 April 2010 06:08:19 pm Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:50:10 +0200
> Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de> wrote:
> Especially on battery, users will appreciate some minutes
>
> > of more battery lifetime and do not care about some ms of IO
> > latencies.
>
> the assumption that power doesn't matter on AC is a huge fiction
> that any data center operator would love to get out of everyones head
> as quickly as possible.
Have I said power doesn't matter on AC?
Do you agree that a datacenter has different performance vs power
tradeoff demands as a battery driven mobile device?
Back to the topic:
As you did not answer on my (several) sysfs knob request(s), I expect
you agree with it and will add one.
It's not only for real usage, but to give people a chance to easily
test and get feedback on different HW.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists