lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:39:34 +0200 From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de> To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, davej@...hat.com, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ondemand: Solve the big performance issue with ondemand during disk IO On Friday 23 April 2010 06:08:19 pm Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:50:10 +0200 > Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de> wrote: > Especially on battery, users will appreciate some minutes > > > of more battery lifetime and do not care about some ms of IO > > latencies. > > the assumption that power doesn't matter on AC is a huge fiction > that any data center operator would love to get out of everyones head > as quickly as possible. Have I said power doesn't matter on AC? Do you agree that a datacenter has different performance vs power tradeoff demands as a battery driven mobile device? Back to the topic: As you did not answer on my (several) sysfs knob request(s), I expect you agree with it and will add one. It's not only for real usage, but to give people a chance to easily test and get feedback on different HW. Thanks, Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists