[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004261824570.3739@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>,
"R. Andrew Bailey" <bailey@...mai.com>,
Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, guenter.roeck@...csson.com,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, yaneti@...lera.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: never allocate PCI MMIO resources below
BIOS_END
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> Glad we agree. As I said (and echoing Bjorn), I think it would be best
> to reserve this space in a way that doesn't just use IORESOURCE_BUSY.
> We want and need to do allocations from the special region, so we
> should mark it as such.
I think Bjorn's patch to pcibios_align_resource() is really good and
clever, and I think it should take care of the need for IORESOURCE_BUSY,
no? We do want to let devices that are _already_ allocated there insert
their resources, it's just that we never want to allocate new ones in the
low 1M region.
Do we actually have a regression left with Bjorn's patch?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists