[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BD6E8A6.5040008@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:37:42 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] KVM: MMU: Track page fault data in struct vcpu
On 04/27/2010 04:28 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index d9dfc8c..8426870 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>>> /* Used for two dimensional paging emulation */
>>> struct kvm_mmu nested_mmu;
>>>
>>> + unsigned long fault_address;
>>>
>> Probably a problem on i386. How does npt handle faults when the
>> guest is using pae paging and the host (in our case the guest...)
>> isn't? I see it uses exit_info_2 for the address, which is a u64.
>>
> This shouldn't be an issue. If we run on 32bit host with nested paging
> the guest can't have more than 4gb of addressable memory because of the
> page table limitations (nested page table is always in host format).
>
But the nested guest can use pae paging and generate a #NPF with
exit_info_2 > 4GB. So we need to keep the full fault address; if we
truncate, the guest might actually resolve the fault and let the nested
guest continue.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists