linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.34-rc5-git7 -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected - &per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffff8139f077>] lock_policy_rwsem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100427014136.GA14719@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:41:37 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc5-git7 -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency
 detected - &per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){+++++.}, at:
 [<ffffffff8139f077>] lock_policy_rwsem_read+0x4a/0x7a

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:30:41PM -0400, Miles Lane wrote:
 > Dave, is this the same?   http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127207512031810&w=2

looks like it to me.  499bca9b6d3243f9278a1f5a22d00e67acdd844d should have fixed it,
but it looks like that's present in -git7, so something is still missing..

	Dave

 > I produced this one by running "find /sys | xargs cat"
 > 
 > [ 2982.773548] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
 > [ 2982.773551] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 #33
 > [ 2982.773554] -------------------------------------------------------
 > [ 2982.773557] head/6335 is trying to acquire lock:
 > [ 2982.773560]  (&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){+++++.}, at:
 > [<ffffffff8139f077>] lock_policy_rwsem_read+0x4a/0x7a
 > [ 2982.773571]
 > [ 2982.773572] but task is already holding lock:
 > [ 2982.773575]  (s_active#102){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81153a23>]
 > sysfs_read_file+0x8d/0x139
 > [ 2982.773586]
 > [ 2982.773586] which lock already depends on the new lock.
 > [ 2982.773587]
 > [ 2982.773590]
 > [ 2982.773591] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
 > [ 2982.773593]
 > [ 2982.773594] -> #2 (s_active#102){++++.+}:
 > [ 2982.773601]        [<ffffffff8107654d>] __lock_acquire+0xb59/0xd11
 > [ 2982.773608]        [<ffffffff8107681a>] lock_acquire+0x115/0x150
 > [ 2982.773613]        [<ffffffff81154556>] sysfs_deactivate+0x9b/0xec
 > [ 2982.773619]        [<ffffffff81154d0a>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x50
 > [ 2982.773624]        [<ffffffff81152e05>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x4e/0x65
 > [ 2982.773629]        [<ffffffff81155fc0>] sysfs_remove_group+0x8c/0xc5
 > [ 2982.773634]        [<ffffffffa00a3d26>]
 > cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x2a6/0x33c [cpufreq_ondemand]
 > [ 2982.773642]        [<ffffffff8139da32>] __cpufreq_governor+0x5d/0xa3
 > [ 2982.773648]        [<ffffffff8139e4e2>] __cpufreq_remove_dev+0x231/0x2e2
 > [ 2982.773653]        [<ffffffff81454e40>] cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x62/0x7a
 > [ 2982.773660]        [<ffffffff8145d636>] notifier_call_chain+0x63/0x97
 > [ 2982.773666]        [<ffffffff810680dc>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x9/0xb
 > [ 2982.773672]        [<ffffffff8144337b>] _cpu_down+0x90/0x29e
 > [ 2982.773679]        [<ffffffff81048cd7>] disable_nonboot_cpus+0x6f/0x105
 > [ 2982.773685]        [<ffffffff81083b94>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xe8/0x1ec
 > [ 2982.773691]        [<ffffffff81083d72>] enter_state+0xda/0x12b
 > [ 2982.773696]        [<ffffffff810834d5>] state_store+0xb1/0xce
 > [ 2982.773702]        [<ffffffff811f2fb3>] kobj_attr_store+0x17/0x19
 > [ 2982.773708]        [<ffffffff8115395a>] sysfs_write_file+0x103/0x13f
 > [ 2982.773713]        [<ffffffff810fb933>] vfs_write+0xa9/0x106
 > [ 2982.773719]        [<ffffffff810fba46>] sys_write+0x45/0x69
 > [ 2982.773723]        [<ffffffff81009d82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
 > [ 2982.773730]
 > [ 2982.773731] -> #1 (dbs_mutex){+.+.+.}:
 > [ 2982.773737]        [<ffffffff8107654d>] __lock_acquire+0xb59/0xd11
 > [ 2982.773742]        [<ffffffff8107681a>] lock_acquire+0x115/0x150
 > [ 2982.773747]        [<ffffffff814582ce>] __mutex_lock_common+0x57/0x558
 > [ 2982.773752]        [<ffffffff81458875>] mutex_lock_nested+0x34/0x39
 > [ 2982.773757]        [<ffffffffa00a3af6>]
 > cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x76/0x33c [cpufreq_ondemand]
 > [ 2982.773763]        [<ffffffff8139da32>] __cpufreq_governor+0x5d/0xa3
 > [ 2982.773769]        [<ffffffff8139e7ec>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x1a8/0x222
 > [ 2982.773774]        [<ffffffff8139ecca>] store_scaling_governor+0x19f/0x1ed
 > [ 2982.773779]        [<ffffffff8139e622>] store+0x56/0x78
 > [ 2982.773783]        [<ffffffff8115395a>] sysfs_write_file+0x103/0x13f
 > [ 2982.773788]        [<ffffffff810fb933>] vfs_write+0xa9/0x106
 > [ 2982.773793]        [<ffffffff810fba46>] sys_write+0x45/0x69
 > [ 2982.773798]        [<ffffffff81009d82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
 > [ 2982.773803]
 > [ 2982.773804] -> #0 (&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){+++++.}:
 > [ 2982.773810]        [<ffffffff810763f7>] __lock_acquire+0xa03/0xd11
 > [ 2982.773815]        [<ffffffff8107681a>] lock_acquire+0x115/0x150
 > [ 2982.773820]        [<ffffffff81458bba>] down_read+0x42/0x57
 > [ 2982.773825]        [<ffffffff8139f077>] lock_policy_rwsem_read+0x4a/0x7a
 > [ 2982.773830]        [<ffffffff8139f0d7>] show+0x30/0x69
 > [ 2982.773835]        [<ffffffff81153a4a>] sysfs_read_file+0xb4/0x139
 > [ 2982.773840]        [<ffffffff810fbb10>] vfs_read+0xa6/0x103
 > [ 2982.773844]        [<ffffffff810fbc23>] sys_read+0x45/0x69
 > [ 2982.773849]        [<ffffffff81009d82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
 > [ 2982.773854]
 > [ 2982.773855] other info that might help us debug this:
 > [ 2982.773856]
 > [ 2982.773860] 2 locks held by head/6335:
 > [ 2982.773862]  #0:  (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at:
 > [<ffffffff811539ca>] sysfs_read_file+0x34/0x139
 > [ 2982.773871]  #1:  (s_active#102){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81153a23>]
 > sysfs_read_file+0x8d/0x139
 > [ 2982.773881]
 > [ 2982.773882] stack backtrace:
 > [ 2982.773886] Pid: 6335, comm: head Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5-git7 #33
 > [ 2982.773889] Call Trace:
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff810755c3>] print_circular_bug+0xa8/0xb7
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff810763f7>] __lock_acquire+0xa03/0xd11
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff810766f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0xd02/0xd11
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff8139f077>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_read+0x4a/0x7a
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff8107681a>] lock_acquire+0x115/0x150
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff8139f077>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_read+0x4a/0x7a
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff81458bba>] down_read+0x42/0x57
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff8139f077>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_read+0x4a/0x7a
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff81459cb9>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x87/0x95
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff8139f077>] lock_policy_rwsem_read+0x4a/0x7a
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff8139f0d7>] show+0x30/0x69
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff81153a4a>] sysfs_read_file+0xb4/0x139
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff810fbb10>] vfs_read+0xa6/0x103
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff81074eae>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x127/0x152
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff810fbc23>] sys_read+0x45/0x69
 > [ 2982.773893]  [<ffffffff81009d82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/