[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100427145804.GA16794@logfs.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:58:04 +0200
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] logfs: push down BKL into ioctl function
On Tue, 27 April 2010 16:24:19 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> I'm sure that logfs doesn't rely on the BKL, but right now,
> we're just pushing it down.
So why do you create logfs_unlocked_ioctl in the first place? ;)
Jörn
--
Measure. Don't tune for speed until you've measured, and even then
don't unless one part of the code overwhelms the rest.
-- Rob Pike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists