[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100427161217.GB7225@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:12:17 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> [100427 08:28]:
>
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > Please pull omap fixes from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git omap-fixes-for-linus
>
> I pulled it this time, but I'm starting to get really irritated with you.
>
> These look like real fixes, but quite frankly, by -rc5, that IS NOT
> ENOUGH.
>
> They need to be _regressions_, not just cleanups and fixes for things that
> have never worked. And this is starting to be a pattern with the omap
> tree: you're not honoring the merge window properly.
>
> Just "it's a bug-fix" or "it's deleting unused code" is not enough. The
> point of the late -rc series is to fix problems from the merge window, not
> add new changes. I realize that you think that all the new changes are
> obviously good, but the fact is, bugs happen even in "obvious bug-fixes".
>
> And that's why we have the rule about late-rc pulls being about
> _regressions_ and/or major oopses/security issues. Not just random
> development that are meant to improve things.
OK point taken. I should have dealt with this earlier. Will only queue
regressions after -rc3 or so.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists