[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100427162201.GA5826@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:22:01 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nauman@...gle.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious
rcu_dereference_check() usage
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:27:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:35:10AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> >
> > > Eric Dumazet traced these down to a commit from Eric Biederman.
> > >
> > > If I don't hear from Eric Biederman in a few days, I will attempt a
> > > patch, but it would be more likely to be correct coming from someone
> > > with a better understanding of the code. ;-)
> >
> > I already replied.
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/21/420
>
> You did indeed!!! This experience is giving me an even better appreciation
> of the maintainers' ability to keep all their patches straight!
>
> I will put together something based on your suggestion.
How about the following?
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit 85fa42bd568ab99c375f018761ae6345249942cd
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Apr 26 21:40:05 2010 -0700
net: suppress RCU lockdep false positive in twsk_net()
Calls to twsk_net() are in some cases protected by reference counting
as an alternative to RCU protection. Cases covered by reference counts
include __inet_twsk_kill(), inet_twsk_free(), inet_twdr_do_twkill_work(),
inet_twdr_twcal_tick(), and tcp_timewait_state_process(). RCU is used
by inet_twsk_purge(). Locking is used by established_get_first()
and established_get_next(). Finally, __inet_twsk_hashdance() is an
initialization case.
It appears to be non-trivial to locate the appropriate locks and
reference counts from within twsk_net(), so used rcu_dereference_raw().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
index 79f67ea..a066fdd 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
@@ -224,7 +224,9 @@ static inline
struct net *twsk_net(const struct inet_timewait_sock *twsk)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
- return rcu_dereference(twsk->tw_net);
+ return rcu_dereference_raw(twsk->tw_net); /* protected by locking, */
+ /* reference counting, */
+ /* initialization, or RCU. */
#else
return &init_net;
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists