linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100427165813.GC7225@atomide.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:58:13 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.34-rc5

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> [100427 09:31]:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > 
> > OK point taken. I should have dealt with this earlier. Will only queue
> > regressions after -rc3 or so.
> 
> Note that the "only regressions" is certainly not a hard rule. Anything 
> that would be valid for -stable is obviously always valid: security 
> issues, major oopses etc etc.

Sure.
 
> But the "only regressions" should kind of be the guiding line, and the 
> others are more like "this is so serious that it should go in regardless 
> of anything else".

OK. I guess was using criteria like "this is needed to boot this and that
board in a usable way" and "let's get all the fixes in" criteria, but that
should have been done way earlier.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/