[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100427180749.GB5586@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:07:56 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Fix redundant_hardirqs_on incremented with
irqs enabled
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:32:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Frederic,
>
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:37:50 +0200 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > When a path restore the flags while irqs are already enabled, we
> > update the per cpu var redundant_hardirqs_on in a racy fashion
> > and debug_atomic_inc() warns about this situation.
> >
> > In this particular case, we need to explictly disable the irqs before
> > updating this stat var in order to update it safely.
> >
> > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/lockdep.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> Ping? Any movement on this?
Ingo, if you have no problems with these two patches, could you please
apply them?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists