[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004272205380.2951@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:39:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
cc: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH:resend] rt: Remove CONFIG_STACK_TRACER from DEBUG_COUNT,
and fix reminder block
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, John Kacur wrote:
> This fix does two things.
This changelog does suck in more than two ways.
> 1. It reverts commit 3e39399ef4a742d994570488994be93ef17d4ef5.
> - The above commit added back a warning about CONFIG_STACK_TRACER
> NOT because the warning was necessary but to fix-up a problem where you could
> get an empty REMINDER block in the demg.
The CONFIG_STACK_TRACER printk has been there before and got dropped
for whatever reason, but the DEBUG_COUNT accounting of
CONFIG_STACK_TRACER still remained.
So the conclusion that the printk needs to be added back is _NOT_
completely unreasonable.
> However, CONFIG_STACK_TRACER really should not be in the reminder block.
> Even when configured-in it is not enabled, and thus has neglible impact.
That argument is bogus as it applies to most of the tracing related
config options.
> 2. It removes CONFIG_STACK_TRACER from DEBUG_COUNT which is the proper fix
> for the empty REMINDER block problem.
It's the proper fix if the warning is not justified, which is not
clear at all. At least not from your changelog.
I do not mind the patch per se, but
1) the changelog should simply say:
rt: Remove CONFIG_STACK_TRACER from REMINDER block
Reason: It does not matter because ....
2) the patch should cover _all_ tracing options which have no
considerable latency impact when just compiled in and not default
enabled.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists