[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100427233111.GF2424@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:31:11 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nauman@...gle.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious
rcu_dereference_check() usage
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:58:30PM -0400, Miles Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:27:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:35:10AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> >> >
> >> > > Eric Dumazet traced these down to a commit from Eric Biederman.
> >> > >
> >> > > If I don't hear from Eric Biederman in a few days, I will attempt a
> >> > > patch, but it would be more likely to be correct coming from someone
> >> > > with a better understanding of the code. ;-)
> >> >
> >> > I already replied.
> >> >
> >> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/21/420
> >>
> >> You did indeed!!! This experience is giving me an even better appreciation
> >> of the maintainers' ability to keep all their patches straight!
> >>
> >> I will put together something based on your suggestion.
> >
> > How about the following?
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > commit 85fa42bd568ab99c375f018761ae6345249942cd
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date: Mon Apr 26 21:40:05 2010 -0700
> >
> > net: suppress RCU lockdep false positive in twsk_net()
> >
> > Calls to twsk_net() are in some cases protected by reference counting
> > as an alternative to RCU protection. Cases covered by reference counts
> > include __inet_twsk_kill(), inet_twsk_free(), inet_twdr_do_twkill_work(),
> > inet_twdr_twcal_tick(), and tcp_timewait_state_process(). RCU is used
> > by inet_twsk_purge(). Locking is used by established_get_first()
> > and established_get_next(). Finally, __inet_twsk_hashdance() is an
> > initialization case.
> >
> > It appears to be non-trivial to locate the appropriate locks and
> > reference counts from within twsk_net(), so used rcu_dereference_raw().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> > index 79f67ea..a066fdd 100644
> > --- a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> > @@ -224,7 +224,9 @@ static inline
> > struct net *twsk_net(const struct inet_timewait_sock *twsk)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> > - return rcu_dereference(twsk->tw_net);
> > + return rcu_dereference_raw(twsk->tw_net); /* protected by locking, */
> > + /* reference counting, */
> > + /* initialization, or RCU. */
> > #else
> > return &init_net;
> > #endif
> >
>
> Worked for me. Thanks!
Thank you both! I have added Eric's Acked-by and Miles's Tested-by.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists