lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100427233111.GF2424@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:31:11 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nauman@...gle.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious
 rcu_dereference_check() usage

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:58:30PM -0400, Miles Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:27:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:35:10AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> >> >
> >> > > Eric Dumazet traced these down to a commit from Eric Biederman.
> >> > >
> >> > > If I don't hear from Eric Biederman in a few days, I will attempt a
> >> > > patch, but it would be more likely to be correct coming from someone
> >> > > with a better understanding of the code.  ;-)
> >> >
> >> > I already replied.
> >> >
> >> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/21/420
> >>
> >> You did indeed!!!  This experience is giving me an even better appreciation
> >> of the maintainers' ability to keep all their patches straight!
> >>
> >> I will put together something based on your suggestion.
> >
> > How about the following?
> >
> >                                                        Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > commit 85fa42bd568ab99c375f018761ae6345249942cd
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date:   Mon Apr 26 21:40:05 2010 -0700
> >
> >    net: suppress RCU lockdep false positive in twsk_net()
> >
> >    Calls to twsk_net() are in some cases protected by reference counting
> >    as an alternative to RCU protection.  Cases covered by reference counts
> >    include __inet_twsk_kill(), inet_twsk_free(), inet_twdr_do_twkill_work(),
> >    inet_twdr_twcal_tick(), and tcp_timewait_state_process().  RCU is used
> >    by inet_twsk_purge().  Locking is used by established_get_first()
> >    and established_get_next().  Finally, __inet_twsk_hashdance() is an
> >    initialization case.
> >
> >    It appears to be non-trivial to locate the appropriate locks and
> >    reference counts from within twsk_net(), so used rcu_dereference_raw().
> >
> >    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> > index 79f67ea..a066fdd 100644
> > --- a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> > @@ -224,7 +224,9 @@ static inline
> >  struct net *twsk_net(const struct inet_timewait_sock *twsk)
> >  {
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> > -       return rcu_dereference(twsk->tw_net);
> > +       return rcu_dereference_raw(twsk->tw_net); /* protected by locking, */
> > +                                                 /* reference counting, */
> > +                                                 /* initialization, or RCU. */
> >  #else
> >        return &init_net;
> >  #endif
> >
> 
> Worked for me.  Thanks!

Thank you both!  I have added Eric's Acked-by and Miles's Tested-by.

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ