[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BD80449.4010700@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:47:53 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM, Fix QEMU-KVM is killed by guest SRAO MCE
On 04/28/2010 05:56 AM, Huang Ying wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Just want to use the side effect of copy_from_user, SIGBUS will be sent
>>> to current process because the page touched is marked as poisoned. That
>>> is, failure is expected, so the return value is not checked.
>>>
>>>
>> What if the failure doesn't happen? Say, someone mmap()ed over the page.
>>
> Sorry, not get your idea clearly. hva is re-mmap()ed? We just read the
> hva, not write, so I think it should be OK here.
>
>
We don't generate a signal in this case. Does the code continue to work
correctly (not sure what correctly is in this case... should probably
just continue).
There's also the possibility of -EFAULT.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists