[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100428135434.GA4662@Krystal>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:54:34 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Peter Fritzsche <peter.fritzsche@....de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@...bazco.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] asm-generic: Don't warn that atomic_t is only 24
bit
* Arnd Bergmann (arnd@...db.de) wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> > 32-bit Sparc used to only allow usage of 24-bit of it's atomic_t type.
> > This was corrected with linux 2.6.3 when Keith M Wesolowski changed the
> > implementation to use the parisc approach of having an array of
> > spinlocks to protect the atomic_t.
> >
> > These warnings were also removed from the sparc implementation when the
> > new implementation was merged in BKrev:402e4949VThdc6D3iaosSFUgabMfvw,
> > but the warning still remained in some other places without any
> > 24-bit-only atomic_t implementation inside the kernel.
> >
> > We should remove these warnings to allow users to rely on the full
> > 32-bit range of atomic_t.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Fritzsche <peter.fritzsche@....de>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
AFAIK that was the last architecture imposing limitations below 32 bits
on atomic_t.
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists