[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6096.1272463619@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:06:59 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: implement the exclusive wait queue as a LIFO queue
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> wrote:
> I don't know how to do that, as maybe there are non-exclusive and
> exclusive wait queues in the same wait queue head. If we want to
> enqueue exclusive wait queues at the head of exclusive queues, we have
> to know where the head is, otherwise, we have to loop to find the head
> when enqueuing.
I suspect you really want to have the semantics defined per-queue. _Either_ a
queue is FIFO (such as processes waiting for a resource so they can do
something with it) _or_ it is LIFO (such as a pool of processes waiting to be
given work).
How often do the two actually mix? And if they do, is that really an error?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists