[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100428151015.GB4100@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:10:15 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ashwin Ganti <ashwin.ganti@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
rsc@...ch.com, ericvh@...il.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@...il.com>, jt.beard@...il.com,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] RFC: p9auth: add p9auth fs
Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@...hat.com):
> On 04/27, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >
> > This introduces a Plan 9 style setuid capability filesystem.
> > See Documentation/p9auth.txt for a description of how to use this.
>
> Can't comment these changes due to the lack of knowledge, just
> a couple of minor nits.
Thanks, Oleg.
> > +static ssize_t p9auth_use_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
> > + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + ssize_t retval = -ENOMEM;
> > + char *user_buf;
> > +
> > + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&cap_mutex))
> > + return -EINTR;
>
> EINTR doesn't look exactly right here, especially if TIF_SIGPENDING is
> spurious. Probably ERESTARTNOINTR makes more sense. Or mutex_lock_killable().
Ashwin had had this as ERESTARTSYS I believe. I'd read something about
userspace should only see -EINTR so I changed it. Sounds like I need
to follow the caller chain some more and learn a thing or two, before
I repost.
> > + user_buf = kzalloc(count+1, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Probably this is OK, but it looks a bit strange we do no check that
> count is not too large.
Yes, I should check that, thanks!
> > + if (copy_from_user(user_buf, buffer, count)) {
> > + retval = -EFAULT;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + retval = use_setuid_capability(user_buf);
>
> It seems that use_setuid_capability() pathes assume that user_buf is
> null terminated? Say, parse_user_capability() does kstrdup(user_buf).
I kzalloc()d to count+1 before, and only copy_from_user() count bytes,
so the last byte should always be 0.
Thanks again,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists