lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1004281153390.1944-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:54:06 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
cc:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: umount blocked for more than 120 seconds

On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:

> On (04/27/10 15:07), Alan Stern wrote:
> > Robert was right.  Your usbmon log covers only the last 40 seconds of
> > data transfer and showed a little over 15 MB being sent, so it seems
> > likely that the entire 246 MB transfer would require more than 10
> > minutes.
> > 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > You can test this easily enough by simply waiting for 12 minutes or so
> > before issuing the "umount" command.
> > 
> So, bug entry is invalid. Right?

Right.  It's not a bug; it's a normal operation that happens to take a 
long time.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ