[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1004281156100.1944-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:59:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
cc: Josua Dietze <digidietze@...isberghof.de>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: USB gadget with drivers "on board"
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, [utf-8] MichaÅ Nazarewicz wrote:
> So it will be enough to change the USB device class for the zeroth
> interface for udev to recognise the mass storage to be ejected? Note
> that I will use mass storage in the second mode as well.
No, you also have to go through a disconnect-reconnect cycle on the USB
bus. When you do, changing the bInterfaceClass value will be
sufficient to tell the kernel that the device needs to be
re-enumerated.
> Also, I think that it might be a good idea to make some "standardised"
> mechanism for all such devices so that a generic udev code could be
> written. Adding things to the descriptors may be difficult in a way,
> but maybe adding "[NoCD]" to the interface name would be enough.
I seriously doubt you'll be able to convince all the other
manufacturers to agree to a standardized convention for this.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists