[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272476697.2267.95.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:44:57 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: grzegorz.chwesewicz@...is.net.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Subject: Re: Problem with "tcp: bind() fix when many ports are bound" commit
Le mercredi 28 avril 2010 à 19:34 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> L
> I am going to test following patch in a couple of hours (I have to
> run ...)
>
> Always allowing a reuse LISTEN if no other listener is already active on
> same IP.
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> index 78cbc39..e2076dd 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ int inet_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk,
> sk2_rcv_saddr == sk_rcv_saddr)
> break;
> } else if (reuse && sk2->sk_reuse &&
> + sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN &&
> sk2_rcv_saddr &&
> sk2_rcv_saddr == sk_rcv_saddr)
> break;
>
>
> --
Hmm, this wont work because we dont know this sk socket will serve as a
listener.
bind(... port=80);
listen(...) or connect(...)
David, I think we should revert patches for linux-2.6, and work on this
problem more closely on net-next-2.6
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists