[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100428014941.GA8389@Krystal>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:49:41 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jbaron@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com, mhiramat@...hat.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, avi@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
dank@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] jump label v7
* Tony Breeds (tony@...eyournoodle.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:58:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> > The kernel stops compiling after the second patch because
> > kernel/jump_label.c is compiled unconditionally, and this generates an
> > attempt to include asm/alternatives.h which is an x86-only phenomenon.
> >
> > Do you have access to a cross-compile environment or at least some
> > non-x86 system you can test build on before submitting these patch
> > sets?
>
> I heard cross-compilers?
>
> http://kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/ i686 and x86_64 and 4.4.0
> compilers suitable for kernel work.
>
> I plan to build 4.4.$latest and 4.5.0 ASAP.
>
> Yours Tony
The crosstool package from Dan Kegel did a good job for this. Not sure
it's currently maintained though. It was a very useful project, it's a
shame if it does not live on. It would be good to have up-to-date and
tested compilers for various architectures available on kernel.org,
ideally with access to a package that helps building compilers for
various architectures.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists