[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100428115039.c276594a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:50:39 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, clalance@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix NULL pointer for Xen guests
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:29:06 -0400
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/28/2010 02:26 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:24:42 -0400
> > Prarit Bhargava<prarit@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Upstream PV guests fail to boot because of a NULL pointer. It is possible that
> >> xen guests have irq_desc->chip_data = NULL.
> >>
> >> Test for NULL chip_data pointer before attempting to complete an irq move.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava<prarit@...hat.com>
> >> Acked-by: Suresh Siddha<suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> >> index 127b871..eb2789c 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> >> @@ -2545,6 +2545,9 @@ void irq_force_complete_move(int irq)
> >> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> >> struct irq_cfg *cfg = desc->chip_data;
> >>
> >> + if (!cfg)
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> __irq_complete_move(&desc, cfg->vector);
> >> }
> >> #else
> >>
> > I assume this is needed for 2.6.34?
> >
> > What about 2.6.33.x and earlier?
> >
>
> Hey Andrew,
>
> I actually pinged Chris Wright to see about including this in the
> -stable branches. I haven't heard anything back so I'll reping him.
>
Well. Pinging people offlist isn't very reliable. Put
Cc: <stable@...nel.org>
at the end of the changelog and cc stable@...nel.org on the original
patch and then the patch will reliably receive consideration for
backporting.
I have added Cc:<stable@...nel.org> to my copy of the patch, so the
-stable guys will at least see it when I drop it after it is merged.
But if the x86 maintainers were to merge your patch as you sent it, it
would have no Cc: <stable@...nel.org> when it goes into Linus's tree.
I worry that if the -stable maintainer see me drop a patch, but the
patch in Linus's tree doesn't have the stable tag, they might not merge
the fix into -stable. I bugged them about this scenario recently and
the reply was a bit waffly ;)
By far the safest thing to do is to include the stable tag in your
changelog right at the outset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists