linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/8] PM: Add suspend blocking work.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201004282308.10751.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:08:10 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] PM: Add suspend blocking work.

On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 04/28/2010 09:40 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> +int schedule_suspend_blocking_work(struct suspend_blocking_work *work)
> >> +{
> >> ...
> >> +	ret = schedule_work(&work->work);
> > 
> > Off-topic. We should probably export keventd_wq to avoid the duplications
> > like this.
> 
> Yeah, had about the same thought.  cmwq exports it so I didn't suggest
> it at this point but then again we don't really know whether or when
> that series is going in

As soon as there are no major objections.  At least to my tree.

> so it might be a good idea to make that change now.  Hmm...

I'd rather like a follow-up patch changing that, if poss.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/