[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BD8AE5A.3000900@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:53:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jbaron@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com,
rth@...hat.com, mhiramat@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com, dank@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] jump label v7
On 04/27/2010 06:49 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Tony Breeds (tony@...eyournoodle.com) wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:58:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>>
>>> The kernel stops compiling after the second patch because
>>> kernel/jump_label.c is compiled unconditionally, and this generates an
>>> attempt to include asm/alternatives.h which is an x86-only phenomenon.
>>>
>>> Do you have access to a cross-compile environment or at least some
>>> non-x86 system you can test build on before submitting these patch
>>> sets?
>>
>> I heard cross-compilers?
>>
>> http://kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/ i686 and x86_64 and 4.4.0
>> compilers suitable for kernel work.
>>
>> I plan to build 4.4.$latest and 4.5.0 ASAP.
>>
>> Yours Tony
>
> The crosstool package from Dan Kegel did a good job for this. Not sure
> it's currently maintained though. It was a very useful project, it's a
> shame if it does not live on. It would be good to have up-to-date and
> tested compilers for various architectures available on kernel.org,
> ideally with access to a package that helps building compilers for
> various architectures.
>
Tony is taking over that work.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists