[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004290027090.2951@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:28:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Guillaume Knispel <gknispel@...formatique.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: reliably replay pending edge-triggered irq
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Guillaume Knispel wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:42:11 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Guillaume Knispel wrote:
> [snip]
> > > acked and masked at controller level and IRQ_PENDING is set.
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 4 ----
> > > arch/arm/configs/acs5k_defconfig | 1 -
> > > arch/arm/configs/acs5k_tiny_defconfig | 1 -
> >
> > Changing the defconfigs should be a separate patch and I'm not
> > going to push such a thing through the genirq tree. The stale
> > entries do not hurt.
>
> Ok
> In this separate patch, to I put "genirq" in the title?
> Do I put it in the same series?
Just keep them out for now and send them to the arch maintainers once
the change hits linus tree.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists