[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100428132413.28bc9ff2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:24:13 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@...ibm.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the v9fs tree
Hi Jens,
Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
fs/9p/vfs_super.c between commit 0b2d973241f9bdbc8ed62caec42543e00ae6bd1e
("9p: VFS switches for 9p2000.L: VFS switches") from the v9fs tree and
commit 0ed07ddb56d1348e5ce33f3b8de20d730351983a ("9p: add bdi backing to
mount session") from the block tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the
fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/9p/vfs_super.c
index 7c94cb0,806da5d..0000000
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
@@@ -77,10 -76,8 +77,11 @@@ v9fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb
sb->s_blocksize_bits = fls(v9ses->maxdata - 1);
sb->s_blocksize = 1 << sb->s_blocksize_bits;
sb->s_magic = V9FS_MAGIC;
- sb->s_op = &v9fs_super_ops;
+ if (v9fs_proto_dotl(v9ses))
+ sb->s_op = &v9fs_super_ops_dotl;
+ else
+ sb->s_op = &v9fs_super_ops;
+ sb->s_bdi = &v9ses->bdi;
sb->s_flags = flags | MS_ACTIVE | MS_SYNCHRONOUS | MS_DIRSYNC |
MS_NOATIME;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists