[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100427221705.1628375b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:17:05 -0400
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yusuke Goda <yusuke.goda.sx@...esas.com>
Cc: ben@...adent.org.uk, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] MMC:Add support MMCIF for SuperH
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:06:08 +0900 Yusuke Goda <yusuke.goda.sx@...esas.com> wrote:
> + time = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(host->intr_wait,
> + host->wait_int == 1 ||
> + host->sd_error == 1, host->timeout);
> + if (host->wait_int != 1 && (time == 0 || host->sd_error != 0))
> + return sh_mmcif_error_manage(host);
wait_event_interruptible_timeout() will return early with -ERESTARTSYS
if the calling process gets signalled (eg, ^C was hit).
The driver uses wait_event_interruptible_timeout() rather a lot and the
two sites I looked at seem to handle the signal_pending() case
correctly.
But incorrectly handling signals with interruptible waits is a
frequently-occurring error in drivers. Did you deliberately cater for
this case, and have you runtime tested it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists