| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-5967ed87ade85a421ef814296c3c7f182b08c225@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:55:01 GMT
From: tip-bot for Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
jbeulich@...ell.com, JBeulich@...ell.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] x86-64: Reduce SMP locks table size
Commit-ID: 5967ed87ade85a421ef814296c3c7f182b08c225
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5967ed87ade85a421ef814296c3c7f182b08c225
Author: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:08:14 +0100
Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:15:47 -0700
x86-64: Reduce SMP locks table size
Reduce the SMP locks table size by using relative pointers instead of
absolute ones, thus cutting the table size by half.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
LKML-Reference: <4BCF30FE020000780003B3B6@....id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-asm.h | 4 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h | 4 +-
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++--------------
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-asm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-asm.h
index b97f786..a63a68b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-asm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-asm.h
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
.macro LOCK_PREFIX
1: lock
.section .smp_locks,"a"
- _ASM_ALIGN
- _ASM_PTR 1b
+ .balign 4
+ .long 1b - .
.previous
.endm
#else
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h
index b09ec55..714bf24 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#define LOCK_PREFIX \
".section .smp_locks,\"a\"\n" \
- _ASM_ALIGN "\n" \
- _ASM_PTR "661f\n" /* address */ \
+ ".balign 4\n" \
+ ".long 661f - .\n" /* offset */ \
".previous\n" \
"661:\n\tlock; "
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 1a160d5..9367384 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static void __init_or_module add_nops(void *insns, unsigned int len)
}
extern struct alt_instr __alt_instructions[], __alt_instructions_end[];
-extern u8 *__smp_locks[], *__smp_locks_end[];
+extern s32 __smp_locks[], __smp_locks_end[];
static void *text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len);
/* Replace instructions with better alternatives for this CPU type.
@@ -235,37 +235,39 @@ void __init_or_module apply_alternatives(struct alt_instr *start,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-static void alternatives_smp_lock(u8 **start, u8 **end, u8 *text, u8 *text_end)
+static void alternatives_smp_lock(const s32 *start, const s32 *end,
+ u8 *text, u8 *text_end)
{
- u8 **ptr;
+ const s32 *poff;
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
- for (ptr = start; ptr < end; ptr++) {
- if (*ptr < text)
- continue;
- if (*ptr > text_end)
+ for (poff = start; poff < end; poff++) {
+ u8 *ptr = (u8 *)poff + *poff;
+
+ if (!*poff || ptr < text || ptr >= text_end)
continue;
/* turn DS segment override prefix into lock prefix */
- text_poke(*ptr, ((unsigned char []){0xf0}), 1);
+ text_poke(ptr, ((unsigned char []){0xf0}), 1);
};
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
}
-static void alternatives_smp_unlock(u8 **start, u8 **end, u8 *text, u8 *text_end)
+static void alternatives_smp_unlock(const s32 *start, const s32 *end,
+ u8 *text, u8 *text_end)
{
- u8 **ptr;
+ const s32 *poff;
if (noreplace_smp)
return;
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
- for (ptr = start; ptr < end; ptr++) {
- if (*ptr < text)
- continue;
- if (*ptr > text_end)
+ for (poff = start; poff < end; poff++) {
+ u8 *ptr = (u8 *)poff + *poff;
+
+ if (!*poff || ptr < text || ptr >= text_end)
continue;
/* turn lock prefix into DS segment override prefix */
- text_poke(*ptr, ((unsigned char []){0x3E}), 1);
+ text_poke(ptr, ((unsigned char []){0x3E}), 1);
};
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
}
@@ -276,8 +278,8 @@ struct smp_alt_module {
char *name;
/* ptrs to lock prefixes */
- u8 **locks;
- u8 **locks_end;
+ const s32 *locks;
+ const s32 *locks_end;
/* .text segment, needed to avoid patching init code ;) */
u8 *text;
@@ -398,16 +400,19 @@ void alternatives_smp_switch(int smp)
int alternatives_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
{
struct smp_alt_module *mod;
- u8 **ptr;
+ const s32 *poff;
u8 *text_start = start;
u8 *text_end = end;
list_for_each_entry(mod, &smp_alt_modules, next) {
if (mod->text > text_end || mod->text_end < text_start)
continue;
- for (ptr = mod->locks; ptr < mod->locks_end; ptr++)
- if (text_start <= *ptr && text_end >= *ptr)
+ for (poff = mod->locks; poff < mod->locks_end; poff++) {
+ const u8 *ptr = (const u8 *)poff + *poff;
+
+ if (text_start <= ptr && text_end > ptr)
return 1;
+ }
}
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists