[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272499451.9739.90.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:04:11 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10][RFC] tracing: Remove duplicate id information in
event structure
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 17:06 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
> > From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> >
> > Now that the trace_event structure is embedded in the ftrace_event_call
> > structure, there is no need for the ftrace_event_call id field.
> > The id field is the same as the trace_event type field.
> >
> > Removing the id and re-arranging the structure brings down the tracepoint
> > footprint by another 5K.
>
> I might have missed it, but how exactly is the event type allocated
> uniquely ? Is it barely a duplicate of the call "id" field ?
It is allocated in kernel/trace/trace_events.c.
The code there scans the "_ftrace_events" section to find all the events
that are created, and it assigns the events a unique id. Currently the
id is just copied from the trace_event field to the ftrace_event_call
data. The two are the same.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists