lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:38:18 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	"Epshteyn, Eugene" <eugene.epshteyn@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] Mobile security processor driver

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 04:10:52PM -0700, Epshteyn, Eugene wrote:
> >From 9230c90ce19747554354c9fc93b3b1c8e661894c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Allyn <mark.a.allyn@...el.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:41:39 -0700
> Subject: RFC [PATCH 4/4] staging: sep: Update TODO

Why are you including the patch twice?

> --- a/drivers/staging/sep/TODO
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sep/TODO

<snip>

Here's your list of what needs to be done to get this code merged, why
have you ignored it when asking us what we thought needed to be done.
Isn't this a good enough list of things left to complete?

again, totally confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists