[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3051.1272557416@jrobl>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:10:16 +0900
From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>
To: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/35] union-mount: Writable overlays/union mounts documentation
Valerie Aurora:
> One of the major difficulties that arises even when doing unioning at
> the VFS level is keeping around the parent's path in order to do the
> copyup later on. Take a look at the code pattern in the "union-mount:
> Implement union-aware syscall()" series of patches. That's the
> prettiest and most efficient version I could come up with, after two
> other implementations, and it's in the VFS, at the vfs_foo_syscall()
> level. I don't even know how I would start if I had to wait until the
> file system op is called.
I agree that is prettiest, and copup at open for write makes it easier.
But some applications issue mmap(MAP_PRIVATE) after open(O_RDWR), for
example modprobe(8). In this case, every kernel module will be copied-up
and it must be a waste of time and space. And I guess this is one reason
why other implementation took the approach of copyup at write.
At the same time, I guess this issue may be less important since other
parts are pretty enough.
J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists