linux-kernel - Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <loom.20100429T063346-954@post.gmane.org>
Date:	Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:36:55 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def

Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> yep.. luckily 33 is not that far behind
> so it shouldn't take too long.
> As for the CPU patience my friend..
> 
> Justin P. Mattock
> 


On further examination (diff'ing /proc/config.gz and the config that isn't
working) it appears likely that the answer is simply that I am an idiot, having
set the default resume partition to an LVM volume that isn't present at the
beginning of boot. Recompiling and checking now.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/