linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100429135204.eb79a986.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:52:04 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

Hi Jens,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
fs/block_dev.c between commit b8af67e2681c693a21f3933e3bdfce4cf66596d3
("fs/block_dev.c: fix performance regression in O_DIRECT|O_SYNC writes to
block devices") from Linus' tree and commit
fbd9b09a177a481eda256447c881f014f29034fe ("blkdev: generalize flags for
blkdev_issue_fn functions") from the block tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a while.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/block_dev.c
index 6dcee88,dd76930..0000000
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@@ -406,23 -406,17 +406,24 @@@ static loff_t block_llseek(struct file 
   
  int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp, struct dentry *dentry, int datasync)
  {
 -	struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(filp->f_mapping->host);
 +	struct inode *bd_inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
 +	struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bd_inode);
  	int error;
  
 -	error = sync_blockdev(bdev);
 -	if (error)
 -		return error;
 -	
 +	/*
 +	 * There is no need to serialise calls to blkdev_issue_flush with
 +	 * i_mutex and doing so causes performance issues with concurrent
 +	 * O_SYNC writers to a block device.
 +	 */
 +	mutex_unlock(&bd_inode->i_mutex);
 +
- 	error = blkdev_issue_flush(bdev, NULL);
+ 	error = blkdev_issue_flush(bdev, GFP_KERNEL, NULL,
+ 				(BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT));
  	if (error == -EOPNOTSUPP)
  		error = 0;
 +
 +	mutex_lock(&bd_inode->i_mutex);
 +
  	return error;
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_fsync);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/