[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100429143931.331c2bab.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:39:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] writeback: pay attention to wbc->nr_to_write in
write_cache_pages
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:41:53 +1000
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> If a filesystem writes more than one page in ->writepage, write_cache_pages
> fails to notice this and continues to attempt writeback when wbc->nr_to_write
> has gone negative - this trace was captured from XFS:
>
>
> wbc_writeback_start: towrt=1024
> wbc_writepage: towrt=1024
> wbc_writepage: towrt=0
> wbc_writepage: towrt=-1
> wbc_writepage: towrt=-5
> wbc_writepage: towrt=-21
> wbc_writepage: towrt=-85
>
Bug.
AFAIT it's a regression introduced by
: commit 17bc6c30cf6bfffd816bdc53682dd46fc34a2cf4
: Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
: AuthorDate: Thu Oct 16 10:09:17 2008 -0400
: Commit: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
: CommitDate: Thu Oct 16 10:09:17 2008 -0400
:
: vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag
I suggest that what you do here is remove the local `nr_to_write' from
write_cache_pages() and go back to directly using wbc->nr_to_write
within the loop.
And thus we restore the convention that if the fs writes back more than
a single page, it subtracts (nr_written - 1) from wbc->nr_to_write.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists