linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/urgent 01/10] rcu: v2: optionally leave lockdep enabled after RCU lockdep splat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:26:05 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 01/10] rcu: v2: optionally leave lockdep enabled after RCU lockdep splat

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>

There is no need to disable lockdep after an RCU lockdep splat, so
remove the debug_lockdeps_off() from lockdep_rcu_dereference().
To avoid repeated lockdep splats, use a static variable in the
inlined rcu_dereference_check() and rcu_dereference_protected()
macros so that a given instance splats only once, but so that
multiple instances can be detected per boot.

This is controlled by a new config variable CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY,
which is disabled by default.

Requested-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h |   15 +++++++++++----
 kernel/lockdep.c         |    2 ++
 lib/Kconfig.debug        |   12 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 07db2fe..ec9ab49 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -190,6 +190,15 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
 
+#define __do_rcu_dereference_check(c)					\
+	do {								\
+		static bool __warned;					\
+		if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !__warned && !(c)) {	\
+			__warned = true;				\
+			lockdep_rcu_dereference(__FILE__, __LINE__);	\
+		}							\
+	} while (0)
+
 /**
  * rcu_dereference_check - rcu_dereference with debug checking
  * @p: The pointer to read, prior to dereferencing
@@ -219,8 +228,7 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
  */
 #define rcu_dereference_check(p, c) \
 	({ \
-		if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !(c)) \
-			lockdep_rcu_dereference(__FILE__, __LINE__); \
+		__do_rcu_dereference_check(c); \
 		rcu_dereference_raw(p); \
 	})
 
@@ -237,8 +245,7 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
  */
 #define rcu_dereference_protected(p, c) \
 	({ \
-		if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !(c)) \
-			lockdep_rcu_dereference(__FILE__, __LINE__); \
+		__do_rcu_dereference_check(c); \
 		(p); \
 	})
 
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 2594e1c..73747b7 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -3801,8 +3801,10 @@ void lockdep_rcu_dereference(const char *file, const int line)
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = current;
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY
 	if (!debug_locks_off())
 		return;
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY */
 	printk("\n===================================================\n");
 	printk(  "[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]\n");
 	printk(  "---------------------------------------------------\n");
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 935248b..94090b4 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -512,6 +512,18 @@ config PROVE_RCU
 
 	 Say N if you are unsure.
 
+config PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY
+	bool "RCU debugging: don't disable PROVE_RCU on first splat"
+	depends on PROVE_RCU
+	default n
+	help
+	 By itself, PROVE_RCU will disable checking upon issuing the
+	 first warning (or "splat").  This feature prevents such
+	 disabling, allowing multiple RCU-lockdep warnings to be printed
+	 on a single reboot.
+
+	 Say N if you are unsure.
+
 config LOCKDEP
 	bool
 	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
-- 
1.7.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/