[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100502200615.GA9051@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 22:06:15 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, ngupta@...are.org, JBeulich@...ell.com,
chris.mason@...cle.com, kurt.hackel@...cle.com,
dave.mccracken@...cle.com, npiggin@...e.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview
> > So what needs to be said here is 'frontswap is XX times faster than
> > swap_ops based solution on workload YY'.
>
> Are you asking me to demonstrate that swap-to-hypervisor-RAM is
> faster than swap-to-disk?
I would like comparison of swap-to-frontswap vs. swap-to-RAMdisk.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists