[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201005022210.54018.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 22:10:53 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Arve Hj??nnev??g" <arve@...roid.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add suspend block api.
On Sunday 02 May 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Adds /sys/power/policy that selects the behaviour of /sys/power/state.
> > After setting the policy to opportunistic, writes to /sys/power/state
> > become non-blocking requests that specify which suspend state to enter
> > when no suspend blockers are active. A special state, "on", stops the
> > process by activating the "main" suspend blocker.
>
> As I explained before (and got no reply), the proposed interface is
> ugly. It uses one sysfs file to change semantics of another one.
In fact this behavior was discussed at the LF Collab Summit and no one
involved had any problem with that.
> > Signed-off-by: Arve Hj??nnev??g <arve@...roid.com>
>
> NAK.
Ignored.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists