[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272865267.2173.180.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 07:41:07 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges
Le lundi 03 mai 2010 à 07:38 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le dimanche 02 mai 2010 à 13:46 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu a écrit :
> > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:53:32 PDT, akpm@...ux-foundation.org said:
> > > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2010-04-28-16-53 has been uploaded to
> > >
> > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> >
> > I thought we swatted all these, hit another one...
> >
> > [ 9.131490] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink.
> > [ 9.131535]
> > [ 9.131535] ===================================================
> > [ 9.131704] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > [ 9.131794] ---------------------------------------------------
> > [ 9.131883] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> > [ 9.131977]
> > [ 9.131977] other info that might help us debug this:
> > [ 9.131978]
> > [ 9.132218]
> > [ 9.132219] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> > [ 9.132434] 1 lock held by swapper/1:
> > [ 9.132519] #0: (nf_ct_ecache_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8148922d>] nf_conntrack_register_notifier+0x1a/0x75
> > [ 9.132938]
> > [ 9.132939] stack backtrace:
> > [ 9.133129] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Tainted: G W 2.6.34-rc5-mmotm0428 #1
> > [ 9.133220] Call Trace:
> > [ 9.133319] [<ffffffff81064832>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb2
> > [ 9.133410] [<ffffffff81489250>] nf_conntrack_register_notifier+0x3d/0x75
> > [ 9.133521] [<ffffffff81b5a157>] ctnetlink_init+0x71/0xd5
> > [ 9.133627] [<ffffffff81b5a0e6>] ? ctnetlink_init+0x0/0xd5
> > [ 9.133735] [<ffffffff810001ef>] do_one_initcall+0x59/0x14e
> > [ 9.133843] [<ffffffff81b2e68a>] kernel_init+0x144/0x1ce
> > [ 9.133949] [<ffffffff81003414>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [ 9.134060] [<ffffffff81598a40>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> > [ 9.134196] [<ffffffff81b2e546>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1ce
> > [ 9.134328] [<ffffffff81003410>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> > [ 9.134530] ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team
> > [ 9.134655] TCP bic registered
> >
>
> Thanks for the report !
>
> We can use rcu_dereference_protected() in those cases.
>
> [PATCH] net: Use rcu_dereference_protected in nf_conntrack_ecache
>
> Writers own nf_ct_ecache_mutex.
>
> Reported-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> ---
Oops scratch that, I'll resend a correct version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists