linux-kernel - RE: Staging: dt3155: Cleanup memory mapped i/o access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0D753D10438DA54287A00B0270842697636EADE191@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
Date:	Mon, 3 May 2010 17:24:35 -0500
From:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, "ss@....gov.au" <ss@....gov.au>
Subject: RE: Staging: dt3155: Cleanup memory mapped i/o access

On Monday, May 03, 2010 2:18 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> Did you rebase this on the latest linux-next tree?
>> 
>> I did.  And I just re-did is again against next-20100503 and it generated
>> the same patch.
>
> Wierd.
>
>> But, I just noticed this:
>> 
>> $ git log drivers/staging/dt3155
>> commit 3c59b4691587b8977cc77ecf07985758a2ba0d97
>> Merge: 7f1e428 bed46a8
>> Author: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>> Date:   Mon May 3 14:17:49 2010 +1000
>> 
>>     Merge remote branch 'staging-next/staging-next'
>>     
>>     Conflicts:
>>         drivers/staging/arlan/arlan-main.c
>>         drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c
>>         drivers/staging/cx25821/cx25821-alsa.c
>>         drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
>>         drivers/staging/netwave/netwave_cs.c
>> 
>> Could the next tree be out of sync with your tree?
>
> Hm, some other tree might be doing something in those files.  But the
> fact that the drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_io.h was so wrong it thought
> it was a revert, makes me suspect that you did it against something
> else.

I just looked at the Next/merge.log file for next-20100503.

$ git merge origin/master
...
 drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c               |    4 +-
...
$ git merge staging-next/staging-next
...
Resolved 'drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c' using previous resolution.
...
Auto-merging drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
...
$ git diff -M --stat --summary HEAD^..
...
 drivers/staging/dt3155/allocator.c                 |   16 +-
 drivers/staging/dt3155/allocator.h                 |    4 +-
 drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155.h                    |   44 +-
 drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c                |  380 +-
 drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_io.c                 |   24 +-
 drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_isr.c                |  297 +-
 drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_isr.h                |    2 +-
...

Not sure if that helps...

>
> If you make this against my staging-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-next-2.6.git
> using the staging-next branch, does that make the patch different?
>
> Let me know if you need help doing that.

I just tried pulling that tree and got:

$ git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-next-2.6.git
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git

So, yes I need help doing that ;-)

Regards,
Hartley--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/