linux-kernel - RE: Staging: dt3155: Cleanup memory mapped i/o access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0D753D10438DA54287A00B0270842697636EADE26A@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
Date:	Mon, 3 May 2010 18:33:08 -0500
From:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"ss@....gov.au" <ss@....gov.au>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Staging: dt3155: Cleanup memory mapped i/o access

On Monday, May 03, 2010 3:45 PM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>> Could the next tree be out of sync with your tree?
>>
>> Hm, some other tree might be doing something in those files.  But the
>> fact that the drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_io.h was so wrong it thought
>> it was a revert, makes me suspect that you did it against something
>> else.
>>
>> If you make this against my staging-next tree at
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-next-2.6.git
>> Using the staging-next branch, does that make the patch different?
>
> Ok.  Pulled your staging-next (thanks Joe).
>
> It's way different from linux-next and matches Linus' tree exactly.  It's
> missing all of your "Drop the "_s"..." and "The typedef is not needed." 
> patches.
>
> Of course I could be on the wrong branch for your staging-next tree.  The
> only branches listed are:
>
> $ git branch -a
> * master
>   remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
>   remotes/origin/master

It appears these are the patches missing in your staging-next tree that do
exist in the linux-next tree:

Staging: dt3155: remove "inline" usage
Staging: dt3155: rename dt3155_fbuffer_s
Staging: dt3155: rename dt3155_config_s
Staging: dt3155: rename dt3155_read_t
Staging: dt3155: rename dt3155_status_t
Staging: dt3155: remove frame_info_t
Staging: dt3155: remove TRUE/FALSE
Staging: dt3155: remove #ifdef
Staging: dt3155: allocator.c: sparse cleanups
Staging: dt3155: fix parentheses and bracket spacing style issues
Staging: dt3155: fix coding style issue in dt3155_isr.c
Staging: dt3155: fix wait_ibsyclr function
Staging: remove unused #include <linux/version.h>

The first one that exists in both is:

Staging: dt3155: fix 50Hz configuration

Could the others be in a staging-stable branch?

Regards,
Hartley--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/