[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y2z412e6f7f1005030005vc3be4977z3add08bfc72d1c44@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 15:05:59 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, jslaby@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
adobriyan@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: use kmalloc() to allocate fdmem if possible
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> My point is, vmalloc() and vfree should do this, not their callers:
>
> vmalloc(size):
> if (size <= PAGE_SIZE)
> return kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> ...
>
> vfree(p):
> if (!is_vmalloc_addr(p) {
> kfree(p);
> return;
> }
> ...
I think we should not change vmalloc/vfree, and you can invent new
memory APIs, such as malloc()/free().
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists