[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100504151443.GA18700@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 10:14:43 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ashwin Ganti <ashwin.ganti@...il.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, rsc@...ch.com, ericvh@...il.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@...il.com>, jt.beard@...il.com,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] RFC: p9auth: add p9auth fs
Quoting David Howells (dhowells@...hat.com):
> Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > + result = kzalloc(MAX_DIGEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > ...
> > + ret = crypto_hash_digest(&desc, &sg, plain_text_size, result);
>
> Does result have to be pre-cleared?
>
> > + user_buf = kzalloc(count+1, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!user_buf)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(user_buf, buffer, count)) {
>
> user_buf doesn't need preclearing. It's just a waste of time. This occurs
> three times.
Hm, yeah, the first doesn't need it at all, and the latter two
should just kmalloc and set user_buf[count] = '\0'.
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists