linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/48] rcu: shrink rcutiny by making synchronize_rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1273004398-19760-8-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue,  4 May 2010 13:19:18 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/48] rcu: shrink rcutiny by making synchronize_rcu_bh() be inline

Because synchronize_rcu_bh() is identical to synchronize_sched(),
make the former a static inline invoking the latter, saving the
overhead of an EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() and the duplicate code.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h |    2 --
 include/linux/rcutiny.h  |   12 +++++++++++-
 include/linux/rcutree.h  |    2 ++
 kernel/rcutiny.c         |    9 ++-------
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 02537a7..d8fb2ab 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -56,8 +56,6 @@ struct rcu_head {
 };
 
 /* Exported common interfaces */
-extern void synchronize_rcu_bh(void);
-extern void synchronize_sched(void);
 extern void rcu_barrier(void);
 extern void rcu_barrier_bh(void);
 extern void rcu_barrier_sched(void);
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index a519587..bbeb55b 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -74,7 +74,17 @@ static inline void rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state(void)
 {
 }
 
-#define synchronize_rcu synchronize_sched
+extern void synchronize_sched(void);
+
+static inline void synchronize_rcu(void)
+{
+	synchronize_sched();
+}
+
+static inline void synchronize_rcu_bh(void)
+{
+	synchronize_sched();
+}
 
 static inline void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 42cc3a0..7484fe6 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ static inline void __rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
 
 extern void call_rcu_sched(struct rcu_head *head,
 			   void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu));
+extern void synchronize_rcu_bh(void);
+extern void synchronize_sched(void);
 extern void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void);
 
 static inline void synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited(void)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny.c b/kernel/rcutiny.c
index 9f6d9ff..272c6d2 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutiny.c
@@ -187,7 +187,8 @@ static void rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused)
  *
  * Cool, huh?  (Due to Josh Triplett.)
  *
- * But we want to make this a static inline later.
+ * But we want to make this a static inline later.  The cond_resched()
+ * currently makes this problematic.
  */
 void synchronize_sched(void)
 {
@@ -195,12 +196,6 @@ void synchronize_sched(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched);
 
-void synchronize_rcu_bh(void)
-{
-	synchronize_sched();
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_bh);
-
 /*
  * Helper function for call_rcu() and call_rcu_bh().
  */
-- 
1.7.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/