[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100504230758.GD8120@dastard>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 09:07:58 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed
via buffered IO
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:27:50AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:14:18AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:27:02PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > This is similar to what already happens in the write case. If we have a short
> > > read while doing O_DIRECT, instead of just returning, fallthrough and try to
> > > read the rest via buffered IO. BTRFS needs this because if we encounter a
> > > compressed or inline extent during DIO, we need to fallback on buffered. If the
> > > extent is compressed we need to read the entire thing into memory and
> > > de-compress it into the users pages. I have tested this with fsx and everything
> > > works great. Thanks,
> >
> > Won't this mean that any direct IO read that spans EOF (i.e. get a
> > short read) now attempt a buffered IO (that will fail) before returning?
> >
>
> Hmm yeah you are right. What would be an acceptable way to avoid this, do a
>
> if (retval || !count || ppos >= i_size_read(inode))
> goto out;
>
> type thing? Thanks,
Yes, that looks like it would work to me. Might be worth a comment,
though.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists